Opinions and recommendations

Subcategories

No. 07-00-359/2015-02

19. Oct 2015. → Age

No. 07-00-359/2015-02  Date: 19 October, 2015 OPINION The opinion was issued in the procedure following complaint from I.D. from B due to the decision of the selection board of the pre-school institution “Dr. S. M.” from Belgrade and the second instance decision of the Secretariat for Education and Children`s Welfare of the Sector for Inspection…

Read Article →
Recommendation to the Public Communal Company “Funeral Services”

15. Oct 2015. → Recommendations to public authorities: measures to be taken

5. Oct 2015, No 07-00-310/2015-02   PUBLIC COMMUNAL COMPANY “FUNERAL SERVICES” B, Director 11000 BEOGRAD Ruzveltova 50 Dear Mr. B, The Commissioner for the Protection of Equality received a complaint stating that the security personnel did not allow the complainant, who is a disabled person, to enter the New Cemetery with his own car on…

Read Article →
No. 07-00-299/2015-02

30. Sep 2015. → Other Personal Characteristics

No. 07-00-299/2015-02 Date: 30 September, 2015 OPINION The opinion was issued in the procedure following complaint from D.P.P. against the Ministry of Finance, Tax Administration, Palilula Branch. The complainant was on maternity leave, and in May 2014 the employer paid her out delayed amount of 133,423.22 dinars for salary compensation, due to which the Tax…

Read Article →
Letter to the President of the National Assembly

29. Sep 2015. → Recommendations to public authorities: measures to be taken

29. Sep 2015,         021-02-256/2015-02   NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Maja Gojković, President 11000 BELGRADE Trg Nikole Pašića 13 Dear Ms. Gojković, Thank you for informing us on the activities and measures that you have undertaken, that is, the activities that you are planning to undertake to act on the recommendation of the…

Read Article →
Recommendation to the National Assembly

18. Sep 2015. → Recommendations to public authorities: measures to be taken

18. Sep 2015,          Number: 021-02-256/2015-02   NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA   Maja Gojković, President 11000 BELGRADE Trg Nikole Pašića 13         Dear Ms. Gojković,   In accordance with my legally prescribed competencies to monitor the implementation of laws concerning the prohibition of discrimination and to recommend measures to achieve…

Read Article →
No. 07-00-275/2015-02

11. Sep 2015. → Gender/Sex

No. 07-00-275/2015-02  Date: 11 September, 2015 OPINION The opinion was issued in the procedure following complaint from Lj. R. from B, against RTB B. d.o.o. from Bor. The complaint states that the provisions of Article 92 of the RTB Bor Collective Agreement stipulate that the employer is obliged to reward employees who have worked with…

Read Article →
No.07-00-270/2015-02

10. Sep 2015. → Disability

No.07-00-270/2015-02  Date: 10 September 2015 OPINION The opinion was issued in the procedure following complaint from I. J. which was filed by his mother, D. J. Č. on his behalf. The complaint states that I. J. has a developmental disorder, that he tried to obtain a medical certificate for enrollment in the secondary school for…

Read Article →
No.07-00-299/2015-02

10. Sep 2015. → Age

No.07-00-299/2015-02  Date: 10 September 2015 OPINION The opinion was issued in the procedure regarding the complaint lodged by D.A. of B. against the C. Bank JSC B. The complainant stated that he was 77 and that he wanted to apply for a loan intended for pension beneficiaries with the C. Bank – B. Branch, but…

Read Article →
No.07-00-361/2015-02

07. Sep 2015. → National Affiliation

No.07-00-361/2015-02  Date: 7 September 2015   OPINION   The opinion was issued in the procedure regarding the complaint lodged by organisations LCFHRY and DCFY against a weekly paper “H.N.” of S. in connection with the article entitled “Egg throwing: frenzy of the Roma – throwing eggs at senior citizens”, published on 10 June 2015. The…

Read Article →
No.07-00-121/15-02

21. Aug 2015. → Age

No.07-00-121/15-02  Date: 21 August 2015   OPINION   The opinion was issued in procedure regarding the complaint lodged by D.K. against the company R.B. “K” Ltd. of L. for discrimination on the grounds of age. The complainant alleged that in early of March 2013 she was proposed to retire, because she met the requirements for…

Read Article →
back to top